The New Left Logic

Do not be left behind in your thinking by the New Left Logic. Progressive activists have approached me with the problems they face in fund raising, entitlement acquisition, and preferment placement with a serious obstacle prevalent among the common, simple folk.

When a white person uses the N-word, for example, they face economic sanctions, ridicule, loss of career and position, and even violence. When a non white person uses the N-word, they are rewarded with recording contracts, adulation, career advancement, and sometimes assassination attempts from jealous rivals. To those unaware of the simple structure of The New Left Logic, this appears to be hypocritcal, illogical, crude, mercenary, and motivated by base greed and lubricated by unnatural lusts. I, Fenris Badwulf, truthspeaker, will now explain to you the easy to assemble New Left Logic so that you activists can get the money you deserve for your worthy activist causes.

Before the New Left Logic we believed that anyone who was prejudiced and acted upon that prejudice was a racist. We can express this mathematically:
Racism = Racism (lets call this statement 1)

After the New Left Logic we now know that all non white village peoples, including poly-gendered whites, are incapable of racism in word, thought, or deed. It is impossible for them to be racists, and conversely, everyone not included in this non-racist group is automatically a racist, regardless of word, thoughts, or deeds. This can be summed up mathematically:

Racism = Prejudice + Power ...( lets call this statement 2)
Prejudice = White - Polygendered ...( statement 3)
Power = White - Polygendered ...( statement 4)
Non-White + Power = Does not apply ...( statement 5)

So you can see right away, The New Left Logic is a much simpler and easier to understand system (statements two through five) in comparison to the old way of thinking (statement 1). Simply enough, heteronormative whites are automatically prejudiced and powerful, and hence 'poof' racists. All counter examples, disagreeable facts, and inconvenient truths do not apply because statement 5 says so.

The New Left Logic is an example of what is called in mathematics a Non-Abelian Group. It obeys the logic of that special place where 'one plus one does not equal two'. You can learn more about non-Abelian groups if you follow this link (*). It is a quick read and easy to understand. The old logic is an example of what is called in mathematics an Abelian group (see (*) for an explaination). For more discerning activists seeking advancement into the six figure salary range, I suggest they take the course PMATH 346 at the University of Waterloo (*). Class sizes are small and the teacher student ratio is high.

So, there you have it.

Second Example. Another useful non-Abelian proof is the statement:

Disagreement = Stupid ... (Statement 6)

Here, everyone who disagrees with statements two through five is proven to be stupid. But, not everyone who is stupid disagrees. Infact alot of stupid people already agree with The New Left Logic. So, in true multicultural style, everybody is included in the diverse set of people who agree with The New Left Logic. As for anyone who dares to disagree, well, they are stupid. This is a method of reasoning familiar to many progressive activists on the internet. Statement six is how it is expressed mathematically.

The New Left Logic. Go get some. Within this homonormal basis, the structure constants are antisymmetric with respect to all three homotrophic indices. Yup. Nobody can argue with that.

I, Fenris Badwulf, wrote this.

Cross posted at Dust My Broom ... always a place of reason