Status and Statistics

Lets take a look at statistics, shall we?

If there is any group that should be allowed to have handguns, it is women. You can argue till you are blue in the face, but, statistically, women are the safest people to have owning guns. There is a wide gap in the values between the gun crime rate of women and that of non-women. Women just do not shoot people like non-women do. They do not leave their hand guns out for children to play with. They do not get drink the cleaning oil to get drunk.

The argument that firearms are inherently dangerous does not apply when their owners are women. Someone is deceiving the public, more specifically someone is deceiving women. While gun ownership may be an issue with non-women, for women, it is not. Women and guns are safe. Non-women with guns are dangerous.

Strangely enough, the statistical chasm between woman and non-woman extends to the other part of the firearms argument: victims. I think pretty well everybody accepts the fact that women make up a disproportionate number of victims of crime. Go into a court some day. A vast majority of the criminals are non-women. If you want to find a woman’s place in the ‘justice’ system, go to a morgue.

So, not only do women not do crime, they still get to participate and share in crime, as victims. Crime is a social problem of non-women. Taking away the rights of responsible women to bear arms empowers those who bully, intimidate, persecute, rob, steal, and rape.

The intellectual understanding of crime fails when the intellectual actually meets a criminal in the flesh. Stealing your credit cards, joy riding in your car, pissing on your carpet, is not an act of social protest for non-women criminals. It is entertainment. Rape is fun.

Women are still going to die in large numbers at the hands of non-women. There will just be a lot fewer murders, rapes, and butchering if they had guns. And the women whose survival rate will be a lot higher are those women who live in the western civilization sector. Things really aren’t going to change that much overseas. Hillary cannot become president. It is a non-women only club. Likewise with the rest of the world. But, for a few millions of western women, gun ownership is a concrete symbol of power that speaks to the primitive non-woman brain. A woman owning a gun is about as dangerous as a can opener, but those women with guns will get women a seat at the large table where the under washed non-women meet and control the planet.

To address social problems in the largest form, using the least amount of resources, would be to simply address the social problems of the subset of our species that is woman. Let us prove this by agitating for gun ownership for women. An armed woman is one less expensive social problem.

The decision as to which sub-set of non-women should be allowed to own firearms can be best decided after women are no longer disarmed victims-in-waiting. Attila the Hun’s mother would accept no less.

I, Fenris Badwulf, wrote this.

xp Mitchieville; DustMyBroom; Stormy Days of March