Activist versus Activist

This is a picture of a movie poster found on the Toronto Subway System. It is advertising for the Basic Instinct 2 movie.

Like most activists, I am quick to spot the flaws in others.

And in this poster, broadly displayed on the subway system, depicts smoking.

Shocking!

Smoking is bad! Second hand smoke is killing our homeless people! Third hand smoke is causing global warming and gives cancer to the Harp seals.

But, before we lose control and start to kidnap and behead people, let us use reason and critical thinking to work throught this problem to find common positive points.

Smoking is an excellent source of revenue for our activist causes. Those tax dollars fund activist activities, homeless shelter cleaning supply suppliers, and kickbacks for the Liberal party. So, smoking is good. It pays the bills.

But smoking is bad, too. You know the party line on smoking.

Besides, what is Hollywood, a valiant ally of all things politically correct, doing whoring after those smoking industry blood money dollars? Obviously, my fellow activists, they are doing the same thing we are, milking the evil capitalists for money to fund quality office space so we can fight poverty.

Remember the wise words of Comrade Stalin. One step forward for every two steps back. So, ignore the hypocrisy. Sharon Stone is not whoring for the tobacco industry in this tobacco industry advertising. She is using a prop to develop character. This is what is called a counter-factual in circumdictional logic. When the facts do not fit the theory, the facts are wrong. That is the law of the theory of evolution of philosophy. Yup.

I, Fenris Badwulf, wrote this.