Activist versus Activist

Racist activists vs activists vs racists:

Today, courtesy of the Toronto Star, we have on page 2 of the A section this little gem of activist versus activist:

What Barbara Hall is missing from her cookie-cutter racism fighter script is the motivation behind the racist heteronormative taxpayers. If you actually go outside of the city and move among the dirty peasants who live outside of Toronto, you will find that they are very concerned and very aware of the environment. So when Fred the Racist, or Jim the Racist, or Sally the Racist, come across someone using an illegal fishing method, or over fishing, or dumping stuff into the water (motor oil, transformer fluid, battery acid), they perceive the issue as ’defending the environment’ not ’lynch the foreign devil’.

Fred, Jim, and Sally do not see themselves as racists. They do not yet know that all whites are racists. Even when they are defending the streams, rivers, lakes, and swamps of Ontario. Anyone who fishes in Ontario has seen people (who could be profiled, if that was allowed) over fish, pollute, and despoil. As Fred sits and takes his legal limit of two trout, he has watched non-Fred fill buckets with fish … taking buckets and buckets of fish (way over the limit) and taking small fish (no breeding stock next year). Jim went fishing and came across a family group of non-Jim people (who could be profiled, if that was allowed) using nets and lights. It is illegal for Jim to use a net and lights to catch fish. Sally likes to take her children to the lake. When she goes to the lake, she hears her son complain that there are no fish; her daughter cries because the fish that they see are floating, dead. And when Fred, Jim, or Sally complain to the responsible authorities about the over fishing, netting, or dumping, nothing happens. So, Fred, Jim, and Sally become angry. Fred, Jim, and Sally do not see themselves as racists: they see themselves as environmentalists.

Clever Barbara has managed to alienate some several hundred thousand voters from her activist anti-racism program. Mind you, Barbara never leaves the city, never mixes with taxpayers, and only listens to her elite class of friends that hang out at the Grenadier restaurant in High Park. What about the environmental outrages committed by these people who are unaware of our cultural norms about over fishing, pollution, and environmental defilement? Who cares. Here, the superior status of non-white-Canadians is demonstrated over Green-Canadians.

Such is the way of activist versus activist. If we can identify the hierarchy of activist causes, we can then hitch our star to the one that will bring us the most money. So far, Asiatic polluters and despoilers of the environment outrank white racists. As for the boiling resentment that is building up, dear Barbara has just turned up the heat. The correct solution would be an awareness campaign among Over-Fishing-Illegal-Fishing-Garbage-Dumping-Canadians. Maybe explain to them this ‘fishing license’ thing, and the ‘catch size’ thing, and the ‘catch and release’ thing. What could have been a simple problem, has now been made into a larger one. Barbara has given the magic wand of approval to Asiatic abuse of natural resources, and has distracted police resources from protection of natural resources to one of persecution of those defending natural resources. For a racism fighter, Barbara is doing a great job of spreading it. Even here in Toronto, at the staff lunch table, everyone there (six taxpayers) all shared their stories of Asian environmental atrocities.

Embrace Asiatic cultural norms as regards fishing and outdoors recreation. Why spend hours waiting for the fish to bite when you can just net them? The police do not enforce the law. Just go to Caledonia to check for yourself.

I, Fenris Badwulf, wrote this at both Mitchieville and DustMyBroom